News Lily:
Run out of fresh things to read? Try Newsyndicated
| |
| science | technology | opinion | other | worldnews | music | politics | humor | Us_News | The_Economy | pictures | psychology | geekery | lolwut | Culture | All Stories | |
| Sharing is Caring... |
|
|
Home |
About Us |
Register |
Submit Link |
Upcoming |
Top Stories |
Random |
Comment Roll |
Epic Comments |
Blog |
RSS
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
97 |
China's Birth Rate To Leave 24 MILLION Men Single
By Cody on 2010-01-11 | 19 comments |
| Travers | 2010-01-11 | ||
|
Crap, now we're really going to get in a war with China!
Reply to this |
| Commander Cody | 2010-01-11 | ||
|
Just when you thought thought though Muslims were sexually repressed.
Reply to this |
| Ryan | 2010-01-11 | ||
|
China is actually starting to freak me out a bit...from the sound of it, they've got a pretty freaking HUGE navy...
Reply to this |
| Travers | 2010-01-11 | ||
|
I hear they have these giant supersonic missiles designed for the sole purpose of destroying US aircraft carriers. They've also got working a-sat tech. We are so boned. Something tells me that if we did get in a fight with China, we'd have to go on the defensive, fighting a war at sea and in the skies. Our ability to invade mainland China... what ability? If it came to that, we'd have to use the nukes. There are just so many Chinese. With any luck we won't get into it with them. It'd be a nasty war. Reply to this |
| Ryan | 2010-01-11 | ||
|
WOrking anti-satellite? As in "Launch a bag of ball bearings"? or as in "Bring a satellite down and do it cleanly"? Reply to this |
| Travers | 2010-01-11 | ||
|
Naw, kinetic. Probably multiple, but could be single, vehicle.
Messy either way.
Reply to this |
| Ryan | 2010-01-11 | ||
|
Sigh...I really really hope we never see that sort of thing...destroying a satellite in orbit would be a pretty big problem for future space missions due to the debris.
Reply to this |
| Travers | 2010-01-11 | ||
|
I guess you missed the memo, dude.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2007_Chinese_anti-satellite_missile_test At least EOS-Aqua had to be moved. Reply to this |
| kino101 | 2010-01-12 | ||
|
their missile goes up, then straight down to contact, impossible to stop with current tech. pretty sure that's why the big bucks on lasers. they brought a diesel sub to w/in 500 yards of an aircraft carrier. they knocked a sat into pieces from the ground, the US had to use a plane to shoot one already on its way down. they have one working used soviet carrier. Janes says they would win in an airfight near China due to pure numbers(this doesn't include possible NATO allies planes). of course there's no way to win an invasion, almost guaranteeing nukes. it's no contest...but, as w/the USSR it ain't gonna happen. for no good reason my opinion is that the great powers have moved past any great war. all future conflicts will be by proxy, conducted at a safe distance for regional dominance. and I still think that the US military is basically mercenary doing the bidding of those countries paying the bills. actions are showing that the US is securing the mid-east for China's oil and gas needs. Reply to this |
| luke | 2010-01-12 | ||
I have come to burst everyone's bubble of 'China has a great military'. They don't. In 20 years they will. They don't now.But experts say China is still decades away from challenging U.S. military's preeminence. Its ground forces field 1980s vintage armor and suffer from significant shortcomings in command and control, air defense, logistics, and communications. Its air force, too, lags behind those of Western powers, though China flies about one hundred top-end Russian Su-27 warplanes and has contracted to purchase newer Su-33s, which are capable of carrier-based operations. China plans to build aircraft carriers domestically, but currently has none under construction. Reply to this |
| Travers | 2010-01-12 | ||
|
Yeah, we can win a war at sea and air. But, they've got 1.3 billion people. That's about 1 of us to every 4 of them. And 24 million of them are REALLY pissed off.
They'd never be able to get their troops here and we can't really invade them on the ground. Meh
Reply to this |
| luke | 2010-01-13 | ||
|
This is very true. Modern countries will only invade backward nations. And no country will invade the US for a very long time because of the 2nd amendment. We are gun nuts here.
Reply to this |
| Commander Cody | 2010-01-13 | ||
|
Not to mention our Nuclear arsenal that blow up the entire earth a few times over. We also have a very diverse landscape there just no way an occupying force could handle manifest destiny. Reply to this |
| luke | 2010-01-13 | ||
|
USA! USA! USA!
Reply to this |
| Commander Cody | 2010-01-12 | ||
|
Luke I'm a Commander I know what China's military clout is .I think it will be more like fifty years until they will considered a serious military competitor.
Reply to this |
| Ryan | 2010-01-12 | ||
|
Thanks, Luke.
Reply to this |
| Travers | 2010-01-11 | ||
|
http://www.sixfivepony.com/gifs/canadian_navy.jpg
Reply to this |
| Zestycookie | 2010-01-12 | ||
|
Time to invest in some fleshlight stock.
Reply to this |
| enkidu | 2010-01-12 | ||
|
I think Japan is already WAYYYY ahead of fleshlight on this one...
Reply to this |